Afghanistan's Crypto Ban After the Taliban Takeover: What Happened and Why It Still Matters

Afghanistan's Crypto Ban After the Taliban Takeover: What Happened and Why It Still Matters Dec, 21 2025

When the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan in August 2021, few expected that within a year, the country would go from being one of the world’s fastest adopters of cryptocurrency to enforcing one of the harshest bans anywhere. By August 2022, the Taliban government declared all cryptocurrency activities haram-forbidden under Islamic law. Trading, mining, even holding Bitcoin or USDT became illegal. The message was clear: no digital money. No exceptions.

But here’s the twist: people still use it. Every day.

Just months before the ban, Afghanistan had climbed to 20th place globally in crypto adoption, according to Chainalysis. That’s not a small number. It means tens of thousands of Afghans-many without bank accounts, without stable income, without access to international aid-had turned to Bitcoin and stablecoins to survive. Then, in a single policy shift, the government turned their lifeline into a crime.

Why Did the Taliban Ban Crypto?

The Taliban didn’t ban crypto because it was technically dangerous. They banned it because it was spiritually dangerous.

In their interpretation of Sharia law, cryptocurrencies are gambling. They have no intrinsic value. No gold backing. No government guarantee. To them, that’s not money-it’s speculation. And speculation is haram. They compared it to betting at a casino. The same reasoning they use to ban stock trading or futures contracts.

But the real reason? Control.

After the U.S. and allies froze Afghanistan’s $9 billion in foreign reserves, the economy collapsed. Banks shut down. Salaries stopped. Aid dried up. Suddenly, people needed a way to send money across borders, buy food, pay for medicine. Cryptocurrency became that way. Peer-to-peer transactions through WhatsApp and Telegram bypassed the Taliban’s grip on the financial system. That’s not just inconvenient for a regime that wants total control-it’s a threat.

So they cracked down. In August 2022, they issued a formal decree: all crypto trading is banned. Exchanges must shut down. Miners must stop. Anyone caught using Bitcoin could be arrested.

The Immediate Impact: Crypto Use Plunged-But Didn’t Disappear

The ban worked-at first.

Monthly crypto transaction volume in Afghanistan dropped from $15 million in early 2022 to just $80,000 by November 2022. That’s a 99% drop. Officially, crypto was dead.

But here’s what the numbers don’t show: the underground market didn’t die. It adapted.

People stopped using exchanges. They stopped advertising. They moved to encrypted apps, cash-in-hand trades in marketplaces, and trusted networks of friends and family. USDT, the tethered stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar, became the silent currency of survival. Why? Because it’s stable. You can buy 10 kilograms of flour for 50 USDT. You can send it to your sister in Pakistan without a bank. You don’t need ID. You don’t need permission.

And the Taliban? They can’t stop it.

They don’t have the bandwidth to monitor every WhatsApp chat. They don’t have the tech to trace every blockchain transaction. They arrest a few traders here and there-but the demand is too high. The need is too urgent. People are starving. And crypto is the only thing keeping them alive.

A woman secretly trades cash for USDT in a market while Taliban officers pass nearby.

Who’s Still Using Crypto-and Why?

It’s not just men. It’s not just tech-savvy youth.

Women are using it more than ever.

Under Taliban rule, women are banned from universities, barred from most jobs, and restricted from traveling without a male guardian. Many can’t even open a bank account. But they can buy Bitcoin. They can receive USDT from relatives overseas. They can pay for online courses or send money to a sister in another city.

Roya Mahboob, an Afghan tech entrepreneur now based abroad, runs a nonprofit that teaches women digital literacy. She says: “Bitcoin gives them a hope of financial freedom.”

Her organization works through hidden networks. Women use burner phones. They trade in secret. They store crypto on hardware wallets hidden under floorboards. For them, crypto isn’t an investment. It’s a lifeline.

Even widows and single mothers are turning to crypto. Without a husband’s name on official documents, they’re locked out of the formal economy. But with a phone and a QR code, they can receive remittances from cousins in Turkey or Germany. They can buy groceries. They can pay for medicine.

The Human Cost of the Ban

The United Nations estimated in 2022 that 97% of Afghans would live below the poverty line. That’s nearly the entire population. Food is available in markets-but no one has money to buy it. The Afghan currency, the afghani, lost 70% of its value in 2022. Inflation hit 40%. Wages vanished.

Before the ban, crypto was a bridge. After the ban, that bridge was torn down-but people kept crossing anyway.

Some risk arrest. Others risk starvation.

There are stories of mothers selling their jewelry to buy USDT. Of students using crypto to pay for online education from Pakistan. Of doctors receiving payments from international NGOs through private crypto channels because the official aid system collapsed.

And yet, the Taliban still insists the ban is working. They claim they’ve “cleaned up” the financial system. But the truth? The system they’re trying to protect-the one controlled by warlords, corrupt officials, and foreign donors-is the one that failed. Crypto is the only thing that didn’t.

Afghan women use satellite internet under the stars to send crypto payments at night.

Where Does Afghanistan Stand Globally?

As of 2025, Afghanistan is one of only nine countries in the world that still outright ban Bitcoin. The rest? They’ve changed their minds.

Morocco lifted its ban in 2024. Nigeria, once hostile, now taxes crypto. Even China, which cracked down hard in 2021, now allows blockchain research and is testing its own digital yuan.

Afghanistan is an outlier. A relic.

And it’s getting lonelier. Countries that once followed its lead-like Iraq and Egypt-are now debating legalization. Experts say the global trend is clear: regulation, not prohibition. Taxation, not arrests. Oversight, not silence.

But Afghanistan doesn’t care about global trends. It cares about control. And right now, control means crushing anything that can’t be monitored, taxed, or stopped.

The Future: Can the Ban Last?

It won’t.

Not because the Taliban will change their minds. But because people won’t stop.

Crypto isn’t a fad. It’s not a luxury. In Afghanistan, it’s infrastructure. It’s the new electricity grid. The new banking system. The new way to survive.

Even with high illiteracy rates, unreliable power, and no internet access for 80% of the population, crypto finds a way. People use SMS-based wallets. They trade cash for crypto in back alleys. They use satellite internet to send funds when the local network is down.

The Taliban can ban it. They can arrest traders. They can shut down internet cafes. But they can’t ban hunger. They can’t ban a mother’s need to feed her child. They can’t ban hope.

And as long as that hope exists, crypto will exist too.

By 2025, underground crypto transactions in Afghanistan are estimated to be back at $5 million per month-up from $80,000 in 2022. That’s not growth. That’s resilience.

The ban was meant to end crypto. Instead, it turned it into a revolution.

16 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Brian Martitsch

    December 21, 2025 AT 22:36
    Bro, this is just crypto bros crying because their gambling den got shut down. 🤡
  • Image placeholder

    vaibhav pushilkar

    December 22, 2025 AT 23:59
    This is why decentralized finance matters. When banks fail, people still have a way to survive.
  • Image placeholder

    SHEFFIN ANTONY

    December 23, 2025 AT 11:39
    You think the Taliban are the problem? Nah. It's the West that flooded Afghanistan with crypto hype while abandoning its people. Now they're mad the system didn't collapse the way they planned.
  • Image placeholder

    Dan Dellechiaie

    December 24, 2025 AT 12:23
    Let’s be real - this isn’t about Sharia. It’s about control. The Taliban can’t tax crypto, can’t track it, can’t extort it. That’s why it’s banned. Not because it’s haram - because it’s inconvenient for tyranny.
  • Image placeholder

    Jordan Renaud

    December 24, 2025 AT 17:25
    There’s something sacred about a mother sending USDT to her daughter across borders with no ID, no permission, no permission slip from a warlord. That’s not speculation. That’s love with a private key.
  • Image placeholder

    Lloyd Yang

    December 26, 2025 AT 04:27
    I’ve read this entire piece three times. The most heartbreaking part isn’t the ban - it’s how quietly, defiantly, people kept going. No fanfare. No hashtags. Just women hiding hardware wallets under floorboards, trading QR codes in alleyways, using burner phones like lifelines. This isn’t crypto adoption. It’s human adaptation at its most raw. The Taliban didn’t ban money. They banned dignity. And people refused to let go.
  • Image placeholder

    Sybille Wernheim

    December 26, 2025 AT 23:45
    The irony? The same people who scream ‘free markets’ when it’s Silicon Valley running the show now scream ‘regulation!’ when it’s a Muslim government doing it. Double standards are the real haram here.
  • Image placeholder

    Rachel McDonald

    December 28, 2025 AT 20:29
    I’m just so tired of people romanticizing this like it’s some noble resistance. People are getting arrested. Kids are starving. This isn’t freedom - it’s desperation dressed up in blockchain.
  • Image placeholder

    Sophia Wade

    December 28, 2025 AT 21:16
    The Taliban’s ban is a theological farce wrapped in authoritarian control. Cryptocurrency, in its purest form, is a neutral tool - neither sinful nor sacred. To label it haram is to confuse the map with the territory. The real sin is the regime’s refusal to acknowledge that human survival transcends dogma. When a mother uses USDT to buy flour because the state failed her, she isn’t committing a crime - she is practicing the oldest form of justice: reciprocity without permission.
  • Image placeholder

    Cathy Bounchareune

    December 30, 2025 AT 06:05
    I grew up in a country where people traded gold in bazaars because banks were unreliable. This is the same thing - just digital. The Taliban are trying to turn back time, but the human need to connect, to survive, to send help across borders - that doesn’t go away because a decree says so.
  • Image placeholder

    Sarah Glaser

    January 1, 2026 AT 04:30
    The global narrative ignores the quiet revolution happening in Afghan homes. This isn’t about speculation or investment. It’s about the reclamation of autonomy. When institutions fail, people build alternatives - not with flags or manifestos, but with QR codes and WhatsApp groups. The Taliban may control the streets, but they don’t control the blockchain.
  • Image placeholder

    Jake Mepham

    January 2, 2026 AT 06:49
    This is the most beautiful, terrifying thing I’ve read all year. People aren’t using crypto because it’s cool. They’re using it because it’s the only thing left that still works. And the fact that women - silenced, confined, erased - are the ones keeping it alive? That’s not resilience. That’s a revolution with a phone and a prayer.
  • Image placeholder

    Charles Freitas

    January 2, 2026 AT 16:49
    Let me guess - the same people who think crypto is ‘decentralized freedom’ are the ones who also think the Taliban are just ‘misunderstood.’ Wake up. This isn’t a moral dilemma. It’s a dictatorship crushing survival mechanisms. Stop pretending this is about theology. It’s about power.
  • Image placeholder

    Craig Fraser

    January 4, 2026 AT 11:51
    I don’t care about the blockchain. I care about the fact that people are risking jail to feed their families. That’s not innovation. That’s tragedy dressed in tech jargon.
  • Image placeholder

    Vyas Koduvayur

    January 6, 2026 AT 00:32
    Let’s break this down. The Taliban banned crypto because it’s untraceable, uncontrolled, and undermines their monopoly on resources. But here’s what nobody’s saying: the same people who are now trading USDT in back alleys were the ones who were getting scammed by fake remittance agents before. Crypto isn’t perfect - but it’s better than the alternatives. And let’s not pretend the West is innocent here. They froze $9 billion in reserves, then acted shocked when people turned to Bitcoin. That’s not a coincidence. That’s policy-induced desperation. Also, the fact that women are the primary users? That’s not accidental. It’s the only financial tool that doesn’t require a male guardian’s signature. So yes - this is feminist resistance. It’s just not wearing a slogan.
  • Image placeholder

    Jordan Renaud

    January 6, 2026 AT 05:02
    The ban didn’t kill crypto. It made it sacred.

Write a comment