Oct, 12 2025
Exchange Viability Calculator
Assess Exchange Viability
Determine if a decentralized exchange has enough liquidity, volume, and community activity to be safe for trading
Higher volume typically indicates more liquidity and market confidence
More pairs generally mean a more functional exchange
More liquidity pools indicate more available trading pairs
Higher activity in social channels shows active user base
Higher scores indicate better documentation and security practices
- Only $36.13 daily volume
- Only 4 trading pairs
- Only 3 liquidity pools
- Zero community activity
- Zero transparency
Thereâs no such thing as MiaSwap v2 - at least not in any real, functioning form. If youâre searching for an update, a new version, or even a working website, you wonât find it. The original MiaSwap, launched in 2022, hasnât processed a single trade in over three hours - and thatâs not an accident. Itâs been dead for months, maybe longer. CoinGecko, one of the most trusted crypto data platforms, flags it as "Inactive - No trades in the last 3 hours" with a Trust Score of 98.87%. That score doesnât mean itâs safe. It means nobodyâs using it.
Letâs be clear: MiaSwap isnât just struggling. Itâs invisible. As of October 2025, it lists only three cryptocurrencies and four trading pairs. The most active pair - MIA to VNDC - had a 24-hour trading volume of $36.13. Thatâs less than the cost of a decent coffee in Auckland. For comparison, Uniswap trades over $1.2 billion in a single day. PancakeSwap moves nearly $500 million. MiaSwap? Itâs not even on the radar. It doesnât rank in the top 500 crypto exchanges globally. It doesnât rank in the top 1,000.
And hereâs the kicker: thereâs no official MIA token supply data. CoinGecko says the circulating supply is ânot reported.â Thatâs not a technical glitch. Thatâs a red flag. If you donât know how many tokens are out there, you canât value them. And if you canât value them, why would anyone trade them? The MIA token price hovers around $0.0117, with zero movement over the past 24 hours. Over the last week, itâs down half a percent. Thatâs not volatility - thatâs stagnation. Coinbaseâs own November 2025 price prediction for MIA? S$0.01. Thatâs a 5% drop from where it is now. No oneâs betting on it.
You wonât find any audits, smart contract addresses, or technical docs. No GitHub repo. No Discord server. No Telegram group. No Reddit threads. Nothing. Legitimate decentralized exchanges like Uniswap, SushiSwap, or PancakeSwap have entire communities built around them - developers, liquidity providers, traders, bug hunters. MiaSwap has silence. And silence in crypto usually means one thing: abandonment.
Some people might think, âMaybe itâs just quiet right now. Maybe v2 is coming.â But thereâs zero evidence of a v2. Not a tweet. Not a blog post. Not a blockchain transaction hinting at an upgrade. No developer commits. No token migration plan. No announcement. If MiaSwap v2 existed, it would be on CoinGecko. It would be on DEX Screener. It would be mentioned in every crypto newsletter that covers obscure projects. Itâs not. Because it doesnât exist.
What about user reviews? You wonât find any on Trustpilot, Reddit, or even niche crypto forums. Thatâs not because people are being nice. Itâs because nobodyâs traded on it. Nobodyâs even tried. You canât review a service youâve never used - and the reason you havenât used it is because it doesnât work. No oneâs linking to it. No oneâs warning about it. Thatâs not because itâs safe. Thatâs because itâs irrelevant.
Compare this to real DEX platforms. Uniswap v3 has over 4,500 tokens listed. PancakeSwap has more than 1,200. They offer yield farming, staking, liquidity pools, and mobile apps. They have audit reports from top firms like CertiK and Hacken. MiaSwap has none of that. No liquidity mining. No fee incentives. No governance tokens. No roadmap. No team. No transparency. Just a website that might still be up, but is completely non-functional.
And hereâs what you need to understand: in crypto, inactivity is not a bug - itâs a death sentence. Projects that stop moving die. Fast. Even the most promising ones need constant development, community support, and trading volume to survive. MiaSwap has none of that. Itâs been frozen since 2022. No updates. No improvements. No users. No reason to exist.
If youâre thinking about using MiaSwap to trade, swap tokens, or invest in MIA - donât. Thereâs no liquidity to trade with. No price movement to profit from. No community to support you if something goes wrong. Even if you manage to connect your wallet, youâll find no trading pairs with enough depth to execute a simple swap without massive slippage. The $28 liquidity at Âą2% means a $100 trade could move the price by 10% or more. Thatâs not trading. Thatâs gambling on a broken machine.
Thereâs a reason no reputable crypto publication - not CoinDesk, not Messari, not Delphi Digital - has ever covered MiaSwap. Thereâs a reason BitCourierâs 2025 exchange review, which covers dozens of lesser-known platforms, didnât mention it once. MiaSwap isnât a scam in the traditional sense. Itâs not running a phishing site or stealing funds. Itâs just⌠gone. A ghost project. A website with no users, no volume, and no future.
So if youâre reading this because you heard about âMiaSwap v2â and thought it might be a hidden gem - itâs not. Thereâs no v2. Thereâs no future. Thereâs no point. Save yourself the time. Save yourself the risk. Look at real, active DEX platforms. Use Uniswap, PancakeSwap, or even smaller but functioning ones like KyberSwap or Curve. They have volume. They have audits. They have people using them every second.
MiaSwap is a cautionary tale. Not because it stole money. But because it promised nothing and delivered less. It didnât fail because it was too risky. It failed because it was irrelevant.
What to do instead of using MiaSwap
- If you want to trade tokens on a decentralized exchange, use Uniswap on Ethereum or PancakeSwap on BNB Chain. Both have deep liquidity and active communities.
- For low-fee swaps, check out 1inch or Matcha - they aggregate liquidity across multiple DEXs to get you the best price.
- Always verify the smart contract address before connecting your wallet. Use Etherscan or BscScan to check if the contract has been audited.
- Never invest in a token with zero trading volume or no reported supply. Thatâs not an opportunity - itâs a trap.
- Use tools like DEX Screener or CoinGecko to check real-time trading activity before you commit any funds.
Why MiaSwap failed
- No liquidity - no one deposited funds to make trading possible.
- No marketing - no community, no influencers, no announcements.
- No technical transparency - no audits, no code, no documentation.
- No utility - MIA token has no use case beyond speculation.
- No updates - no team activity since 2022.
Itâs not complicated. If you build a crypto project and nobody shows up, it dies. MiaSwap didnât get hacked. It didnât get shut down. It just faded away - quietly, completely, and permanently.
Is MiaSwap v2 a real exchange?
No, MiaSwap v2 does not exist. There is no official launch, no blockchain deployment, and no public announcement of a version 2. The original MiaSwap platform has been inactive since at least early 2025, with no trades in over three hours according to CoinGecko. Any claims about a v2 are either misinformation or deliberate deception.
Can I still trade MIA tokens on MiaSwap?
Technically, you might be able to access the website, but there is no meaningful trading activity. The only live trading pair (MIA/VNDC) had a 24-hour volume of $36.13 as of October 2025. Liquidity is less than $30 at any price point, meaning even small trades would cause massive slippage. Itâs not a functioning market - itâs a placeholder.
Is MiaSwap safe to use?
Safety isnât the main issue - usability is. Thereâs no evidence MiaSwap is a scam designed to steal funds. But because itâs inactive, thereâs no support, no updates, and no way to recover assets if something goes wrong. Using it exposes you to the risk of losing funds due to lack of liquidity, unclear contract addresses, or a site that could disappear at any moment.
Why does CoinGecko show a 98.87% Trust Score for MiaSwap?
CoinGeckoâs Trust Score is based on trading volume, liquidity, and exchange activity - not security or legitimacy. A high score doesnât mean the exchange is trustworthy. It means the platform is technically functioning and has some data flowing. In MiaSwapâs case, the score is high because the system still reports minimal data, but the actual trading volume is near zero. Itâs a misleading metric for inactive exchanges.
What should I use instead of MiaSwap?
Use established decentralized exchanges like Uniswap (Ethereum), PancakeSwap (BNB Chain), or SushiSwap. These platforms have millions in daily volume, audited smart contracts, active communities, and mobile apps. Theyâre reliable, transparent, and widely used. Avoid any exchange with less than $1 million in daily volume unless youâre doing deep research - and even then, proceed with caution.
Is MIA token worth buying?
No. MIA has no circulating supply data, zero price movement, and no use case. Its value is purely speculative, and even professional platforms like Coinbase predict only a 5% change by November 2025. With no liquidity, no demand, and no development, MIA is effectively worthless. Investing in it is gambling with no odds in your favor.
Final verdict
MiaSwap isnât a crypto exchange you should consider - itâs a ghost. No v2. No updates. No users. No future. If youâre looking to trade crypto on a decentralized platform, there are dozens of better, safer, and active alternatives. Donât waste your time chasing a dead project. Stick to exchanges with real volume, real audits, and real communities. Your funds - and your peace of mind - will thank you.
Nisha Sharmal
October 12, 2025 AT 11:05Karla Alcantara
October 12, 2025 AT 11:08Jessica Smith
October 12, 2025 AT 11:11Petrina Baldwin
October 12, 2025 AT 11:15sundar M
October 12, 2025 AT 11:18Nick Carey
October 12, 2025 AT 11:21Sonu Singh
October 12, 2025 AT 11:25Peter Schwalm
October 12, 2025 AT 11:28Alex Horville
October 12, 2025 AT 11:31Marianne Sivertsen
October 12, 2025 AT 11:35Stephanie Alya
October 12, 2025 AT 11:38olufunmi ajibade
October 12, 2025 AT 11:41Manish Gupta
October 12, 2025 AT 11:45